Legal Opinion

Power v. Estate of Power

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Appeal of Charles F. Power from order of distribution of the residue of an estate. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Abram L.’ Power died leaving three sons- and a daughter. To two of his sons he had .made advancements, — one of $2,400, and the other of $3,000... *588Before his death he had conveyed to his four children a piece of real estate valued at $10,000. March 29, 1886, he deeded to the appellant a lot in the city of Detroit, worth about $1,600; the consideration expressed in the deed being one dollar. The sole question is whether this conveyance, under our statute, was an advancement. The court below held that it was. The statute reads as follows:

“All gifts and grants shall be deemed to have been made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re of Freeman McClintock's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Weatherhead v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olney v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Stark v. StarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In re Hall EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Superior Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API