Legal Opinion
State v. Daniels
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 2007No. 27821PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.
Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. She challenges the admission at trial of the drugs found in her car. She argues the police lacked reasonable suspicion to detain her for the drug dog sniff that prompted their discovery. We affirm.
In reviewing a suppression ruling, we view all evidence and inferences favorable to the ruling, and disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Galazin, 58 S.W.3d 500, 507 (Mo. banc 2001). Furthermore, we must defer to the trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations. State…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. PeeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. FlowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BarlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.