Legal Opinion

Golonka v. Department of Education

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1981No. Docket 50152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff Golonka’s motion for summary judgment, the practical effect of which was to deny her request for a writ of mandamus which would have compelled the Michi gan Department of Education to certify her as a teacher consultant.

Plaintiff Golonka, certified by the State Board of Education as a general education teacher and a special education teacher, taught in the South Redford School District. As stipulated to by the parties, for more than ten years she has taught handicapped students with learning disabilities, who have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Board of Education v. Superintendent of Public InstructionMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Carlson v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. South Looking Glass Drainage District Board v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ivie Bowen v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Gentile v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. King v. MintzesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
  4. Michigan Education Ass'n v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Ivie Bowen v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API