Legal Opinion

(PC) Williams v. Trimpey

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 21, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02148Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LEE WILLIAMS, No. 2:24-cv-02148 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TRIMPEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

and 19 submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. (ECF No. 9.) 20 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 21 Also before the undersigned is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API