Legal Opinion

Schaub v. City of Scottsbluff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1957No. 34153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boslaugh, J. '•

The • subject' of this litigation is a claim of appellee for benefits provided by the Firemen’s Pension Act from the city of Scottsbluff. It is a city of the first class without a.home rule charter. It has a paid fire department but does not have a board of fire and police commissioners.Appellee submitted to the city cquncil of appellant a written statement which he asked; > should be considered as a petition. It contains the following:

Appellee was, on September 11, 1953, a fireman on the paid fire department of the appellant and has continued in that capacity since that date.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Lambert v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Broabhurst v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Barkalow Bros. Company v. EnglishNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuhlmann v. Platte Valley Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dovel v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23Nebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hooper v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Schaub v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API