Legal Opinion

Wilkenfeld v. Ballard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1935No. 10327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

While no written opinion is required under the disposition determined upon for this cause, in deference to the helpfulness of both sides in ably arguing and briefing it, this brief resume of the grounds upon which an affirmance has been ordered is made:

The appeal is from an order of the court below refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction theretofore granted, as follows:

“In Chambers:
“On this the 20 day of March 1935, came on to be heard the application of plaintiff in the above styled and numbered cause for an injunction and it appearing to the Court that same should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. CaubleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Camden Fire Ins. v. HillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Railroad Commission v. RealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co. v. City of AmarilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Campbell v. UlchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Temple Independent School Dist. v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. McKee v. City of Mt. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Sipe v. SayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Sipe v. SayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API