Hill v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
1. It lias been held: “A single stockholder in a corporation aggregate can not, without suing in behalf of all the interested stockholders and allowing them to become coparties, maintain an action against the directors for misfeasance or nonfeasance in their official conduct, whereby the income or earnings of the corporation, and consequently the value of the plaintiff’s stock, were less than they otherwise would have been. If the plaintiff was the sole stockholder whose interest was affected by the default attributed to the directors, he should have so alleged in his petition. As the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hines v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Weslosky v. QuartermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bethune v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Hinton v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- McAfee v. ZettlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Geeen v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Castleberry v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936