Legal Opinion
Fieeiki v. Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided September 22, 2005No. 20040368-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ORME, J.
¶ 1 We have determined that “[t]he facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record!,] and the deci-sional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument.” Utah R.App. P. 29(a)(3). Moreover, the issues presented are readily resolved under applicable law.1
¶ 2 A termination for “just cause” requires three elements: culpability, knowledge, and control. See Utah Admin. Code R994 — 405-202 (2004). While knowledge and control were quite clearly established in this ease, the culpability element presents a somewhat closer question.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Kehl v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibson v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Lane v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Wagstaff v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carbon County v. Workforce Appeals BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Carbon County v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Carbon County v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Carbon County v. WFSVUtah Supreme Court · 2013