Baker v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.
In my view, the certified ballot title substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.0351 and, therefore, I would approve it. ORS 250.085(4).2
Even if we do not believe that a certified ballot title is the best of all possible ballot titles, this court must approve a certified ballot title that substantially complies with the statutory standards. Ransom v. Roberts, 309 Or 654, 659, 791 P2d 489 (1990). We are not empowered to change a certified ballot title merely because we are of the opinion that we can write a “better” one. Priestley v. Paulus, 287 Or 141, 145, 597 P2d 829 (1979);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel Chapman v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Ransom v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Allison v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.