Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baker v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. SC S38512, SC S38511Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

In my view, the certified ballot title substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.0351 and, therefore, I would approve it. ORS 250.085(4).2

Even if we do not believe that a certified ballot title is the best of all possible ballot titles, this court must approve a certified ballot title that substantially complies with the statutory standards. Ransom v. Roberts, 309 Or 654, 659, 791 P2d 489 (1990). We are not empowered to change a certified ballot title merely because we are of the opinion that we can write a “better” one. Priestley v. Paulus, 287 Or 141, 145, 597 P2d 829 (1979);…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Priestley v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel Chapman v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ransom v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Allison v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API