Legal Opinion
Teriaca v. Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System/Annuity & Pension Board
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 10, 2003No. Nos. 02-2545, 02-2720PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Leane Teriaca appeals from the trial court's order affirming the termination of her duty disability retirement (DDR) allowance by the City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System/Annuity and Pension Board (Board).2 The Board also appeals the reversal of its decision terminating Richard Jasso's DDR allowance. We determine the phrase "fit for service," found in Chapter 36 of the Milwaukee City Charter (MCC), is ambiguous; thus, we must harmonize this phrase with the wording of other ordinances dealing with the City's retirement plans. In doing so, we determine that a recipient found no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. CrozierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. Annuity & Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Teriaca v. MILWAUKEE EMPLOYE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Benjean F. Lara v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2026
- Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005