Legal Opinion

Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 28, 1956No. Civ. A. 2363PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, District Judge.

1. Plaintiff, Kinnear-Weed Corporation, is a Texas corporation having its principal office and place of business in Beaumont, Texas. Plaintiff is the owner of U.S. Patents Nos. 2,380,112 and Re. 23,416, both issued to C. W. Kinnear, the subject matter of which is a rotary drill bit for drilling oil and gas wells. These patents constitute plaintiff’s principal assets and plaintiff’s only business is the exploitation of these patents.

2. Defendant, Humble Oil & Refining Company, is a Texas corporation having its principal office and place of business in Houston, Texas.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kinnear v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Coastal Distributing Company, Inc. v. Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd., and Ngk Spark Plugs [u.s.a.], Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. The Taylor-Reed Corporation v. Mennen Food Products, Inc., American Home Products Corporation, and Frederick C. MennenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API