Legal Opinion
Mims v. Kingsley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 14, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused to him by the defendant’s negligence. By his answer the defendant denied the allegation that he was negligent and that his negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. The defendant alleged, also, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The case was tried to the jury, who returned a verdict for the defendant. The court denied the plaintiff’s motion to set it aside. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment.
In his first assignment of error the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Petrillo v. KolbaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Reciprocal Exchange v. Altherm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gennallo v. MazzacaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Steinmetz v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canterbury Realty Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Domenick v. Wilbert Burial Vault Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. v. EhrhornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Marchand v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. v. EhrhornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958