Legal Opinion

United States v. Stidman

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 25, 1990No. ACM 27833PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

In this child abuse case, the testimony of the prosecutrix directly contradicts that of the appellant and his witnesses. After meticulous analysis, we are not persuaded that the evidence is sufficient to prove the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, we reverse his conviction for sodomy and indecent acts upon a child, violations of Articles 125 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 934.

The appellant, a career noncommissioned officer, was found guilty by members despite his pleas. His sentence is a bad conduct discharge, confinement for five years,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HarvilleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. AllenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. MeyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BaheDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
  2. United States v. PearsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. StidmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API