Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Harville

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 13, 1982No. 37,996; ACM S24696PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Judge:

At his special court-martial1 appellant was found guilty, inter alia, of wrongful appropriation of an automobile. We granted review of this case to determine whether the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction of this offense. We have perused the testimony at trial. As we conclude that it failed to exclude any fair and reasonable doubt except that of guilt, we reverse the decision of the court below regarding that offense. 7 M.J. 895.

*271A brief examination of the evidence is essential. Appellant, charged with stealing Airman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HayesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. JohnpierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. CaidUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. MasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. HarvilleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. BillingsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. Torres-RodriguezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API