Legal Opinion

Arif v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 28, 2025No. 4:24-cv-04044Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA . SOUTHERN DIVISION MAHER ARIF, BRAD ELLISH, BATMADAKH CHOIJIN and DAGVADOR 4:24-CV-04044-LLP BAYARSAJHAN, individually and on behalf of □ all others similarly situated, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT vs. Plaintifts, THE RECORD, GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL, STAYING PROCEEDINGS, AND WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. This case relates to a practice Wells Fargo followed until February 22, 2023: charging Deposit Item Return Unpaid Fees to consumer accountholders. (Exh. H to Ward Decl, Doc.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Tommy Joe Stutzka v. James P. McCarvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API