Legal Opinion

Baez v. Bane

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter Tom, J.

The novel issue raised in this proceeding is whether the New York State Department of Social Services (State DSS) should forfeit its right of reimbursement for interim assistance benefits paid to a recipient when its subsidiary, the New York City Department of Social Services (City DSS), withholds Supplemental Security Income (SSI) checks, issued to the recipient, for more than 10 days in repeated violation of Federal and State statutes.

Petitioner Jose Baez (Baez) brings this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul so much of a determination made after a fair…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ista Management v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Rivers v. SchweikerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Lutz v. AmrheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. New York State Ass'n of Homes & Services for Aging, Inc. v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Verbal v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cabasquini v. Commissioner of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API