Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency v. Whitney House Associates
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
We are to decide whether a condition placed by the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) on the extension of a loan commitment, that the borrower reimburse the MHFA for arbitrage losses, was enforceable. The question was submitted on the MHFA’s motion for summary judgment, which a judge of the Superior Court resolved — *239we think mistakenly — against the MHFA. We are of opinion that the MHFA is entitled to judgment in its favor.2
These are the material facts, based on the summary judgment materials. MHFA first issued a commitment for a permanent loan (i.e., a “take out” loan to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc. v. T. Wellington Carpets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Nelson v. HamlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeLuca v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Mass. Hous. Fin. Agency v. WHITNEY HOUSE ASSOCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Dennis v. KaskelMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
- Orlando v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1998