Legal Opinion

Martin v. Burke

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-eorge H. Vinette, J.

This proceeding was instituted, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the *1043respondents to classify the position of Director of the Department of Urban Renewal of the City of Utica in the unclassified service of the Civil Service of the State of New York and to classify the positions of the deputy director and secretary to the said director in the exempt class of the State Civil Service.

The facts are substantially as follows:

On or about May 6, 1958, the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of Utica created the position of Director of Urban Renewal of the City of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Matter of Carow v. Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Matter of Simons v. . McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Foy v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Heath v. CreaghNew York Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amico v. Erie County LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Dellecese v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Martin v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Cole v. Town Board of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API