Legal Opinion
Hynes v. Doe
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George J. Balbach, J.
The Special Prosecutor moves to punish respondent for contempt of court in that he failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum. Respondent cross-moves to quash the subject subpoena duces tecum and seeks his own order of contempt.
The facts are as follows: A subpoena duces tecum, dated June 26, 1979, was served on respondent and required that he produce all of his income tax records from 1966 through 1978 along with supporting documents before a Queens Grand Jury on July 13, 1979. Respondent failed to produce his tax records before the Grand Jury on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Larisa F. v. Michael S.New York Family Court · 1984
- N. A. Development Co. v. JonesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Odimgbe v. DockeryCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992