Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

Opinion by

Judge Kramer

(Concurring and dissenting in part) :

I agree with the majority on their determination that the appellant’s argument based upon the expansion of a nonconforming use cannot be upheld under the facts of this case. This writer wrote a Dissenting Opinion in the case of Township of Ohio v. Builders Enterprises, Inc., 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 39, 276 A. 2d 556 (1971); and the Majority Opinion was affirmed by the Supreme Court at 446 Pa. 319, 284 A. 2d 686 *606(1972). The effect of these decisions is that the owner of a nonconforming use property must have patently indicated that the…