Legal Opinion

Clark v. Essex International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 75-3306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GORBEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs instituted an action against the defendants for allegedly supplying a defective machine to the plaintiff’s employer. The defendant has joined the employer, Dill Products, Inc., as a third-party defendant alleging that the machine was altered, modified and changed by the employer. Third-party defendant, Dill Products, Inc., by its attorneys, moves the court to dismiss the third-party action against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

In support of the motion, movant relies upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. GLANCEY v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Grim v. Weissenberg School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. Swartz v. Carlisle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Robinson v. Fulghum Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Collins v. Walter C. Best, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Greenleaf v. Robert F. Flood Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API