Clark v. Essex International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GORBEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs instituted an action against the defendants for allegedly supplying a defective machine to the plaintiff’s employer. The defendant has joined the employer, Dill Products, Inc., as a third-party defendant alleging that the machine was altered, modified and changed by the employer. Third-party defendant, Dill Products, Inc., by its attorneys, moves the court to dismiss the third-party action against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
In support of the motion, movant relies upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- GLANCEY v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Grim v. Weissenberg School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Swartz v. Carlisle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Robinson v. Fulghum Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Collins v. Walter C. Best, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Greenleaf v. Robert F. Flood Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1976