Legal Opinion
In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 27, 2021No. 5:20-cv-08324Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TOPDEVZ, LLC, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08324-SVK 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 98 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of advertisers, allege that Defendant LinkedIn 13 Corporation overstates the level of actual user engagement with ads placed on the LinkedIn 14 platform in order to overcharge advertisers. See Dkt. 89 (Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)). 15 All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.