Legal Opinion

Oldfield v. Marriott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 11, 1851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This case was brought up, by writ -of error, from the Circuit Court of' the United States for the District of Maryland. It was an action brought by Oldfield against Marriott, who was the cdllector of the port of Baltimore, to recover .back the amount of duties paid under protest upon an importation of coffee in a Portuguese vessel from . Rio Janeiro. On the 26th of August, 1840, a treaty was made between the. United.

Read the full summary

This case was brought up, by writ -of error, from the Circuit Court of' the United States for the District of Maryland. It was an action brought by Oldfield against Marriott, who was the cdllector of the port of Baltimore, to recover .back the amount of duties paid under protest upon an importation of coffee in a Portuguese vessel from . Rio Janeiro. On the 26th of August, 1840, a treaty was made between the. United. States and Portugal (8 Stat. at-Large, 560), the second article of which provided that “ vessels' of the UniteStates of America arriving, either laden or in ballast, in the ports…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wayne

delivered thé opinion of the court.

This cause was tried and decided in the Circuit Court, upon a. statement of facts made by the parties.

The question arising from it is, whether or not the vessels of Portugal are within that clause of the act of the. 30th of July, 1846, to reduce duties on imports, in which, it is said coffee and tea are exempt from duty when imported direct from the place of their growth or production in American vessels, or in foreign vessels entitled by reciprocal treatiés to be exempt from discriminating duties, tonnage, and other charges.

It is contended that Portuguese…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. The Kathryn B. GuinanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Great-West Life Assurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. v. HeddenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890
  5. St. John v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API