Legal Opinion

Ruddell v. Dillman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C.

— This was a suit by the endorsees against the maker and endorsers of a promissory note, payable at a bank in this State, to the order of the payee, negotiable by the statute as an inland bill of exchange, and governed by the law merchant. The original appellee, John Dillman, was the maker of the note; the other appellees were the endorsers. Dillman answered in two paragraphs :

The first was the geiieral denial.

The second was substantially as follows : That Hudson & Dougherty, the payees of the note, came to his residence and proposed to sell him dry goods for fifty cords of wood,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kimble v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Maxwell v. MorehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ruddell v. FhalorIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Fisher v. Von BehrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Yeagley v. WebbIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API