E.S. v. Regence BlueShield
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 E.S., et al., 11 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:17-cv-01609-RAJ 12 v. ORDER 13 Regence BlueShield, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended 17 Complaint. Dkt. # 37. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant 18 portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that oral argument is 19 unnecessary. For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED. 20 II. BACKGROUND 21…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.