Legal Opinion

The Ph&338nix Ins. Co. v. Johnston

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. T. M. Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

This is an action of assumpsit on a policy of insurance, by appellee against appellant. The policy recites that for a consideration stated the company insures “Bobert F. Johnson against loss or damage by fire or lightning to the amount of $8300, as follows: $4000 on two-story shingle and metal roof frame building, while occupied by assured as a dwelling No. 1, (including foundation, cellar or basement walls); $1500 on household furniture, (describing certain articles) while contained in dwelling No. 1; $500 on piano or organ and printed music while contained in dwelling No. 1; $1500 on metal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Phœnix Ins. v. SpiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Fitch v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  2. Phenix Insurance Co. v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Swedish American Insurance v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Chas. Kronauer & Co. v. Mechanics Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  5. Phenix Insurance v. GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API