Legal Opinion

Waterfront Estates Development, Inc. v. City of Palos Hills

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 15, 1992No. 1—90—3502, 1—90—3542 consPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiff Waterfront Estates Development, Inc. (WED), appeals an opinion and order of the circuit court of Cook County denying WED’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on counts I and II of WED’s complaint for a declaratory judgment. These counts sought a declaration that an ordinance regulating the external appearance of certain property and establishing the defendant appearance commission (Commission) of defendant City of Palos Hills (City) was unconstitutional. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The record indicates…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Heaven's Little Hands Day CareAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Brown v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Puritt v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Reece v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Hanna v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API