Legal Opinion
Hanna v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 6, 2009No. 1-07-3548PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FITZGERALD SMITH
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs Albert C. Hanna (Hanna) and Carol C. Mrowka (Mrowka) (collectively, plaintiffs), filed a 20-count complaint against the City of Chicago, the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, and several city officials (collectively, the City), alleging that the Chicago Landmarks Ordinance (the Ordinance) (Chicago Municipal Code §§2 — 120—580 to 2 — 120—920) was invalid on its face and as it applied to plaintiffs’ respective properties. The City moved to dismiss counts I, II, III, and V through XX, pursuant to section 2 — 615 of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- East St. Louis Federation of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis School District No. 189 Financial Oversight PanelIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Bellevue Shopping Center Associates v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025
- In Re BjIllinois Supreme Court · 2009