Legal Opinion

Birge-Forbes Co. v. Wolcott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1915No. 441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Aiipeal from District Court, Martin County; S. J. Isaacks, Judge. Action by G. W. Wolcott against the Birge-Eorbes Company and others. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This was a suit by appel-lee, G. W. Wolcott, against Birge-Forbes Company and N. B. Birge and Thomas Forbes individually, to recover title and possession of leagues Nos. 253 and 254, Ward county school lands, situated in Martin county, Tex., and to determine and locate the north boundary line of said leagues owned by appellee, and the south boundary line of leagues Nos. 259 and 260, Borden county school land in said Martin county, owned by appellants. Appel-lee described his said leagues by metes and bounds, claiming in his petition that the northern boundary lines of his said leagues and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kauffman & Runge v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Giddings v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Scarbrough v. AlcornTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mayer v. RamseyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Roche v. LovellTexas Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Nat. Ins. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Houston Oil Co. v. BiskampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Freestone County v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API