The Trefusis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.
In this case we affirm the decree of the district court. The appellant has assigned six errors. The last three relate to complaints made by the appellant against the salvors for want of skill, care, and energy in rendering the salvage services. *315Tlie district court examined these complaints carefully, and reviewed the evidence relied on for their support, and found that they were not sustained. If we should hold that this finding on this issue is not binding on us, we would be constrained, by the testimony contained in the record, to concur in it. It is clear to us…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The SybilSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- The ConnemaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- The FlottbekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Coggins v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Crosby Transp. Co. v. SautterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- The Santa RitaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Simpson v. DollarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.