Legal Opinion
Weisburgh v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 18, 1994No. 4-92-CV-638PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
In this action, the plaintiff, a corporate shareholder and putative class representative, alleges that the individually-named defendants — various officers and directors of St. Jude Medical, Inc. (“St. Jude” or “the company”) — and the defendant corporation committed fraud by providing materially false and misleading information to St. Jude stockholders and market analysts, and by failing to disclose material facts concerning the company’s financial status.
The defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Morton v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Parnes v. Gateway 2000, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Digi International, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Ancor Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Florida State Board of Administration v. Green Tree Financial Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.