Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. CHRISTOPHER FRIES v. NEXTSTEP ARTHROPEDIX, LLC, and RANDY THEKEN

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 11, 2026No. 2:22-cv-00098Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. CHRISTOPHER FRIES, Case No. 2:22-cv-98-KCD-NPM Plaintiffs, v. NEXTSTEP ARTHROPEDIX, LLC, and RANDY THEKEN Defendants, / ORDER Relator Christopher Fries claims that Defendants NextStep Arthropedix, LLC and Randy Theken devised a kickback scheme which netted them millions in ill-gotten gains at the government’s expense. Seeking to help Uncle Sam recoup his losses, Fries brings this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729. Defendants now move to dismiss the case (Doc.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API