Legal Opinion

Linstad v. Sitka School District

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1998No. S-7493PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Evie Linstad was a tenured special education teacher employed by the Sitka School District. She appeals a decision of the superior court affirming, on de novo review, the District’s decision to not retain her for incompetency. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Terry Coon was the principal of the school at which Linstad taught. He believed that her teaching was deficient. In September 1989 he formulated an “Individual Assistance Plan” for Linstad. This plan identified specific areas in which Linstad’s teaching was deficient and set forth specific…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grissom v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tenala, Ltd. v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kilmer v. Dillingham City School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wade v. Granite City Community Unit School District, No. 9Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brown v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API