Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 19, 1944No. 10510Published

1Opinion of the Court

143 F.2d 1003 (1944)

CROWELL

v.

BAKER OIL TOOLS, Inc., et al.

No. 10510.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 30, 1944.

Concurring Opinion July 19, 1944.

Rehearing Denied August 4, 1944.

Joseph F. Westall, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Oscar A. Mellin, of Oakland, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a suit for declaratory judgment determining the validity of Patent No. 1,748,007 for a guiding, floating and cementing device for well casings, now owned by appellee Baker Oil Tools,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API