Legal Opinion

Robert E. Diehl, Inc. v. Morrison

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-0633PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

On the grounds of diversity of citizenship, defendant, Roger A. Morrison, has petitioned this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446, for removal of a mortgage foreclosure action plaintiff instituted against him in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. He has also moved the court to strike or open a default judgment entered against him in the state court. Plaintiff, opposing the removal, has filed a motion to remand the case to the Dauphin County Court. Plaintiff asserts that this court cannot accept jurisdiction of this action because: (1)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Frank and Lucille Ristuccia v. Earl and Bernice AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. In Re 73rd Precinct Station House, Borough of BrooklynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  4. Kizer v. SherwoodDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. National Expositions, Inc. v. DuBoisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. USAA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  2. Nieto v. University of New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  3. Philpott v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. MHM Sponsors Co. v. Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United NationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. First City, Texas-Beaumont, N.A. v. TreeceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API