Frank and Lucille Ristuccia v. Earl and Bernice Adams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants were state court defendants who successfully counterclaimed in that litigation which was concluded on September 11, 1963, when the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles entered judgment for them. Approximately one year later appellants, acting in propria persona, moved to reopen the judgment and modify the award, alleging fraud and collusion by their attorneys and the opposing parties. This motion was denied on October 2, 1964, and appellants appealed. The California District Court of Appeal affirmed and appellants were ordered to pay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by32 opinions
- Oviedo v. HallbauerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re 73rd Precinct Station House, Borough of BrooklynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- In Re BoyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- In The Matter Of Meyerland Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Jackson v. American Savings Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.