Legal Opinion
United States v. Jack Sigal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1978No. 77-2073PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jack Sigal was charged, in a one-count indictment, along with co-conspirators Mayer and Baker, with conspiracy illegally to import marijuana and possess the same with intent to distribute it. 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 963. The alleged conspiracy involved a scheme by Sigal and Baker to transport marijuana from Mexico into the United States in small private aircraft. According to evidence presented at their jury trial, Sigal and Baker were the architects of the scheme and solicited Mayer to pilot the aircraft to be used in the smuggling enterprise. Mayer in turn sought…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Anderson v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Donald Eugene Parker, United States of America v. Nicholas FaitheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Dominic Phillip Brooklier, Samuel Orlando Sciortino, Louis Tom Dragna, Michael Rizzitello, and Jack LociceroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Howard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Charles Edward McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.