Legal Opinion

Polzin v. National Cooperative Refinery Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1954No. 38,888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for the pollution of plaintiff’s land, more particularly a deep water well, pursuant to the provisions of G. S. 1949, 55-121.

A mistrial resulted and defendants have appealed solely from an order overruling their separate demurrers to plaintiff’s evidence. For brevity we shall refer to appellant, National Cooperative Refinery Association, as “National,” and to appellant, Northern Ordnance, Incorporated, as “Northern,” where necessary to distinguish between appellants.

The record in this appeal is quite…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Taggart v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Tilden v. AshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Gibson v. BodleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Mosby v. Manhattan Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API