Legal Opinion

Clausel v. Clausel

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1998No. 97-CA-00085-SCTPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

714 So.2d 265 (1998)

Gary Daniel CLAUSEL

v.

Barbara Lynne CLAUSEL.

No. 97-CA-00085-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 4, 1998.

David Clay Vanderburg, for Appellant.

H.R. Garner, Hernando, for Appellee.

Before SULLIVAN, P.J., and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and WALLER, JJ.

JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

¶ 1. Barbara Lynne Clausel, the appellee, filed a Complaint for Divorce and Amended Complaint for Divorce on the 12th of January, 1996. The Appellant, Gary Daniel Clausel, filed a pro se Answer and subsequently employed counsel to represent him and filed an Amended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McEachern v. McEachernMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gillespie v. GillespieMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dufour v. DufourMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Draper v. DraperMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lowrey v. LowreyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chesney v. ChesneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Evans v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  5. Gray v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API