Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Lee

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 23, 2020No. 3:14-cv-00542Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Kathryn AYERS, et al., Case No.: 14-cv-00542-BGS-NLS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 13 v. REGARDING THE ISSUE 14 James Yiu LEE, et al., PRECLUSIVE EFFECT OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN 15 Defendants. SEC v. LEE FOR THIS ACTION 16 [ECF No. 204] 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiffs move this Court to determine if certain issues decided in the previous SEC 20 litigation, 14-cv-00347-LAB-BGS (hereinafter “SEC case”), are collaterally estopped in 21 the present case. (See ECF Nos. 204;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In Re Peter Gottheiner, Bankrupt. United States of America v. Peter GottheinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API