Legal Opinion

The Matter of Bruce D. Bohlen v. Thomas P. DiNapoli

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2020No. 6Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 6 In the Matter of Bruce D. Bohlen, et al., Respondents, v. Thomas P. DiNapoli, &c., et al., Appellants. Sarah L. Rosenbluth, for appellants. George J. Szary, for respondents. FAHEY, J.: Government pensions are based on employees’ regular average salaries. All New York State employees rely on the integrity of the pension system. The protection against its manipulation is one of the Comptroller’s primary responsibilities. -1- -2- No. 6 Here, we uphold a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Toys" R" US v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kranker v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API