Frontline Communications International, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Sprint Communications Company, L.P. (“Sprint”) moves for summary judgment on John Millwood’s counterclaim for unlawful retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For the reasons that follow, Sprint’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
This action originally involved a contract dispute between Sprint and several telecommunications resellers. In 2001, the resellers sued Sprint for adding a surcharge to their bill in excess of a contractually specified rate. In the course of the litigation, Sprint brought third-party claims against its former employee,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Akeem Oliver v. City of New York, Joseph Gonzalez, Kenneth J. Taylor, Kevin McLeod, Tong Jiang, Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Carry Chan, Kristine Mustillo, Sonhando EstwickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Aslin v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019