Lemelson v. Synergistics Research Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to disqualify defendants’ counsel Victor Wigman contending that during a prior representation of plaintiff Wigman had access to confidential information relevant to this litigation; that Wig-man will be or ought to be called as a witness at trial; and that counsel’s obligation to avoid even the appearance of impropriety requires disqualification.
Defendants maintain that continued representation is proper and any disqualification would result in considerable hardship in light of counsel’s long-term involvement on defendants’ behalf in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Global Van Lines, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Pain Prevention Lab, Inc. v. Electronic Waveform Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.