Augur v. New York Belting & Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Scire facias, upon a process of foreign attachment; brought to the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Fairfield, and tried on the general issue, closed to the court, before Brewster, J. Judgment for the defendants, and motion for a new trial by the plaintiff. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
On the 1st day of January, 1872, Matthew Colgan was in the .employ of the defendants, under an implied agreement between them that such employment should continue. On that day, by a written order, accepted by the defendants, he assigned, in good faith and for a valuable consid*537eration,bis earnings under the agreement for the four months then next following, to Carroll & Bolán. He continued in such service during the four months and received in full the consideration of the assignment.
In March following the plaintiff factorized Colgan’s wages, and recovered judgment against him for thirty-one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hawley v. BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metcalf v. KincaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Kane v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Henderson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Engeldinger v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Harrop v. Landers, Frary & Clark Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.