Burns v. Bradford
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA HARRY BURNS, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-274-SLP ) REGAN H. BRADFORD, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) O R D E R Plaintiff, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a Complaint [Doc. No. 1] against Defendants Dr. Regan H. Bradford, Dean McGee Eye Institute, and “Insurance Holders.”1 [Doc. No. 1] at 1–2. For the following reasons, this action is DISMISSED. I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction The Court has first reviewed the Complaint to determine whether the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction is proper.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Northington v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Nielsen v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.