Legal Opinion
Skaggs v. Howell
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided July 2, 2024No. 4:22-cv-01029Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JEREMY SHANE SKAGGS PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:22-cv-01029-LPR WHITNEY HOWELL AND BENJAMIN HOWELL DEFENDANTS ORDER This Order DENIES Jeremy Shane Skaggs’s Motion to Remand.1 As a threshold matter, the Court notes that Mr. Skaggs’s Motion violates Local Rule 7.2(a). It is not accompanied by a brief. For that reason, the Motion is denied to the extent it raises any non-jurisdictional issues. Thankfully for Mr. Skaggs, the main issue raised by the Motion is a jurisdictional one. And because of the important Article…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.