Legal Opinion
Quincy Lee Co. v. Lodal and Bain Engineers Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1980No. B-8710PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEAKLEY, Justice.
The issue in this suit is whether an engineer is entitled to a statutory mechanics’ lien on the property of a developer by virtue of a contract with a public utility district. Lodal & Bain Engineers, Inc., sued Bayfield Public Utility District, the Quincy Lee Company, Royal Crest Inc., and Texas Central Mortgage Company to recover fees for engineering services and to foreclose equitable, statutory mechanics’ and constitutional mechanics’ liens on land owned by the Quincy Lee Company, Royal Crest Inc., and Texas Central Mortgage Company, the developers. Lodal & Bain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 v. MannTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Atascosa County v. AngusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Kelly v. HeimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Lodal & Bain Engineers, Inc. v. Bayfield Public Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stephens v. LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Kirby Lake Development, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- City of LaPorte v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- City of Corpus Christi v. Heldenfels Bros., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Amegy Bank National Ass'n v. Brazos M & E, Ltd. (In Re Bigler LP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.