Legal Opinion
Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 v. Mann
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1940No. Motion No. 14568PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore
This is a mandamus proceeding instituted in the Supreme Court by Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 of Harris County as relator against Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, as respondent, praying that writ of mandamus issue, requiring the Attorney General to approve the transcript showing the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds of relator in the aggregate amount of $60,000.00, and that he be required to certify to the Comptroller of the State of Texas that such bonds are valid, legal, and binding obligations of the Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 of Harris County,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foster v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- O'BRIEN v. WheelockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- City of Arlington v. LillardTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Stratton v. Commissioners' Court of Kinney CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Wood v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Bexar Metropolitan Water District v. City of Bulverde, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- State Ex Rel. Pan American Production Co. v. City of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Winograd v. Clear Lake City Water Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Lower Nueces River Water Supply District v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Matagorda County Drainage District No. 3Texas Supreme Court · 1980
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.