SMA Life Assurance Co. v. Piller
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In this interpleader action we are called upon to determine which party is entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy purchased after the separation but before the divorce of Thomas and Martha Bammer. We conclude that under Pennsylvania law the children of the decedent and not the named beneficiary are entitled to the pro*917ceeds of the policy in this case. We will, therefore, affirm the decision of the district court.
I
Martha Bammer and Thomas Bammer, Jr. were married in 1971. They had two children, Thomas III and Samantha. After several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pivirotto v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kleinfelter v. KleinfelterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lehmicke v. LehmickeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Horsham Township v. WEINERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Travelers Insurance v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sma Life Assurance Company v. PillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988