Legal Opinion
Pivirotto v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 1987No. 71 W.D. Appeal Docket, 1986PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*248OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
We granted the petition for allowance of appeal of the City of Pittsburgh (hereinafter, “the city”) to determine whether the city improperly failed to give notice to appellee of its intent to demolish a building the city had sold to appellee in a tax sale fourteen months prior to the demolition.
The real property which is the subject of this dispute was a dwelling located at 5741 Pierce Street in the city. On September 12, 1977, the property was sold for taxes by the city treasurer to appellee. There was in effect, at that time, a period of one year after…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Tracy v. County of Chester, Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kerr v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Gault's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ceresini v. Valley View Trailer ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re GravesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Husak v. Fayette County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.